Racecracker
Update – 14/3/2023
We have suspended the review till later in the year as Clive suffered a mini stroke some weeks ago and, as a consequence, has been unable to provide his Racecracker selections since.
Thankfully, Clive is making good progress in his recovery and plans to return when ready. However, for obvious reasons, there is no set date for when this will be.
This email is confirmation that your subscriptions have been paused (no more renewals will be taken) until such time as the service resumes. We certainly don’t want anybody to be out of pocket for a service that hasn’t been received.
Best wishes,
Start of Racecracker Review
Racecracker is a alternative horse racing service that puts the punter first, it claims that one of the reason it’s in business is to provide a service that every one can afford at £19.97 I agreed it is one of the cheapest services I have seen.
Is it any good?
Racecracker will undergo a 3 months trial where we will check the odds availability, service and as always the profitability, ROI and strike rate.
Easy of Use
| Number of Daily Bet | 4 bets |
| Betting Bank | 100 pts |
| ROI | |
| Total profit | |
| How are Tips received | Telegram, Web Portal and email |
| Cost of service | £19.97 monthly |
| Offers for the theDailyTipster |
What Racecracker says
Some people might call me a “socialist” for caring about all the working men and women out there… but if you’re from a background like we are you’ll understand why we try to treat low stakes punters with the respect they deserve.
And, despite what you might think, a low stakes service doesn’t mean a small profit, or small winners… far from it…
A steady 10 points per month, with winners as big as 14/1, 11/1, and 20/1
As I say, we’ve been test-driving a brand new horse race tipping service with a handful of Bet Chat readers since January 1st 2021.
It’s called Racecracker.
And, I don’t mind saying, it’s been very successful.
Here’s the rules we played by…
- Around 4 bets (on average) delivered at 9am every day
- Mostly 1 point stakes, with the occasional 2 pointer
Here are the results…
- 40.09 points profit from January 1st 2021 to May 20th 2021
- 10 points profit per month average
- 79 winners and 35 profitable placed bets
- Win only up to 11/2, each way from 6/1
- Big prices winners include Missing Matron 20/1 (a two pointer), Dallas Des Picton 66/1 placed, Golden Taipan 16/1, See You At Midnight 14/1, and Quick Draw 11/1
And here are the stats that really matter to us (and likely you)…
- At £10 bets the total profit was £400, or £100 per month
- At £5 bets the total profit was £200, or £50 per month
By the way, track record numbers are based on Oddschecker’s third best price. That means beta testers were easily able to get on at those prices, and if anything we’re underestimating the profit you could have made.
And over the last six years, his young horses have shown a profit running in 3yo and 3yo+ handicaps at York in the months of June, July, and August.
That knowledge could have made you 89 points over five years.
Now, consider this is just one of the 154 “micro systems” we track on a daily basis and you can start to see how we’re able to build up such a steady profit while keeping the bookies guessing.
And we’re always researching and testing new systems…
Here’s our process for uncovering new potential micro systems in four chestnuts…
🌰 We largely focus on trainer habits and trends
🌰 Jamie comes up with the potential ideas
🌰 I research them to see if there’s anything in it
🌰 We then monitor them on a monthly basis to see which ones need swapping in and out of our “profitable list”
To manage all of these micro systems, we use the in-depth data and analytics tools over at HorseRaceBase… and we have multiple accounts like this one full of our systems…
Betting Bank
We have had a drawdown of greater than 40 points but we advise a bank of 100 points, especially if your bank is not a part of a bigger betting bank.
To me, the only thing that represents betting disaster is the total loss of my betting bank and I act with caution at all times. In addition, as the systems are constantly changing, past drawdowns do not truly reflect the possibility of future drawdowns.
