Tenner Tips Review

Name: Tenner Tips Review
Item: Tenner Tips
Author: theDailyTipster

by Sean Roberts · 5th October 2026

Horse Racing Tipster

Tenner Tips

Horse Racing

A medium risk strategy with 40.00 pts historical drawdown and 54.00% profitable months tracked over 26 months.

Tenner Tips Review – Updated October 2026

Tenner Tips made £-477.50 profit in September with an average of 60 Horse Racing tips per month, based on an average stake of £25.

They have made £-838.75 profit in the last 3 months with an ROI this month of -32.37% and a strike rate of 23.33%.

The a poor risk rating Tenner Tips when combined with an average 2 Star high profit rating.

Tenner Tips averages £-279.58 monthly profit over 3 months on Horse Racing tips, with an ROI of -19.86% and Strike Rate of 27.97% .

Over the last 12 months Tenner Tips has had 6 winning months and only 6 losing months and has earned £3865.25 profit in the last 26 months across 60 Horse Racing tips per month, based on an average stake of £25 giving an average monthly profit of £148.66.

How We Review Tipsters

Last updated: 5 October 2026. We score each tipster using tracked results, ROI, strike rate, volatility, and drawdown over time.

Bet responsibly. Never stake money you cannot afford to lose.

Compare all tipsters | Ask a question

Tipster Comparison Score

58%

Tier: Watchlist

Weighted from consistency, recent ROI, drawdown control, track record length, and profit efficiency.

Consistency54%
Recent ROI0%
Drawdown Control73%
Profit Efficiency78%
Track Record Length100%
Edge Signal100%

Performance Overview

Strategy Profile	Mixed Profile
Risk Classification	Medium Risk
Profitable Months	53.9%
Largest Historical Drawdown	40 points
Recommended Betting Bank	71 points
Tracked Performance Period	26 months
Expected Value (per bet)	0.11
Loss Recovery Speed	Fast Recovery

Performance Comparison

Current Month

£-477.50Profit

-32.37% ROI

23.33% Strike Rate

6.49 Avg Odds

Last 3 Months

£-838.75Profit

-19.86% ROI

27.97% Strike Rate

7.56 Avg Odds

Last 12 Months

£1,177.50Profit

9.37% ROI

35.78% Strike Rate

8.14 Avg Odds

Pros & Cons

Pros
No Pros to mention

Cons
Subscription cost not value for money
Long losing runs

Overall Assessment

Average Monthly Profit	£-279.58
Strike Rate	27.97%
Return on Investment	-19.86%
Profit Rating
Low Risk Rating
Overall Rating

How to Use This Service

How will I receive my tips?

Tip notifications are sent out via email. You can view all active tips from your tipsters in your own dashboard

Is payment taken out automatically in future?

Recurring subscriptions will automatically renew so you won't miss a single tip. If you forget to cancel a subscription please contact us and we'll sort it out. See our Terms & conditions for more information.

I have another question...

If you have any more questions about this tipster go to the tipsters website and email them

Full Results & More Info

Behaviour Analysis

Performance behaviour is mixed without a clear pattern. Performance varies significantly between months. Large performance swings are common. Normal betting downturns occur. Patience is required during downswings. A moderate betting bank is recommended. Shows a strong mathematical advantage. Wins significantly outweigh losses. Suitable for balanced betting approaches. Demonstrates a long-term proven record. Losses recover quickly indicating sustainable long-term performance.

What Following This Service Feels Like

Following this service requires patience. The longest losing run in the tracked period was 4 months without a winner. This is not unusual in sports betting, and bettors need to accept that downsides happen. The service does eventually recover, but mental resilience is required to maintain confidence during these periods.

Performance is highly volatile with significant swings. Some months see substantial profits, while others experience drawdowns. This is characteristic of selective betting strategies that prioritize quality over volume. Expect variability rather than linear progression.

On the positive side, 53.9% of months are profitable, and the service demonstrates excellent recovery capability. After experiencing drawdowns, selections typically bounce back within 1-2 months. The maximum historical drawdown of 40.45 points represents the worst-case scenario for this tracking period.

Profit Style Explanation

Edge Classification: Strong Edge

Profit Distribution: Wild Swings

The service achieves its profits through a extraordinary profit factor of 2.34. This means for every £1 in losses, the service generates £2.34 in gains. The strong edge edge is applied through wild swings betting patterns, where selections are made with conviction only in high-probability scenarios.

Who Is This Service Suitable For?

This service is best suited for balanced bettors. The medium risk risk classification indicates the level of drawdown exposure you should expect.

A minimum betting bank of 70 points is recommended to comfortably absorb the service's volatility without affecting decision-making during losing periods. This bank size provides a 3-5% margin for the tracked maximum drawdown.

The service has proven long term confidence rating based on sample size, consistency, and historical performance. This reflects how reliably the statistical patterns are expected to repeat.

Monthly Profit Breakdown (Last 12 Months)

Month	Profit (£)	Avg Odds	ROI (%)	Strike Rate (%)
9/2026	£-477.50	6.49	-32.37%	23.33%
8/2026	£-227.50	7.85	-17.84%	27.27%
7/2026	£-133.75	8.36	-9.39%	33.33%
6/2026	£-172.50	10.56	-11.90%	41.94%
5/2026	£287.50	8.58	17.97%	46.15%
4/2026	£116.25	8.31	7.88%	32.79%
3/2026	£831.25	8.37	69.27%	42.86%
2/2026	£-100.00	7.02	-10.53%	30.95%
1/2026	£245.00	8.11	21.30%	38.78%
12/2025	£471.25	7.83	42.84%	38.00%
11/2025	£425.00	8.15	41.46%	34.00%
10/2025	£-87.50	8.13	-6.25%	40.00%

Tenner Tips Last 12 Months Profit Chart

Community Reviews

Editorial ratings above are from our analysis. Ratings below come from community submissions and are moderated before publishing.

Overall Community Rating: 0.0/5

Value for Money: 0.0/5

Approved Reviews: 0

Leave a Reply

Frequently Asked Questions

How risky is following this tipster?

This tipster has a historical maximum drawdown of 40.45 points and is classified as medium risk. A betting bank of around 70.79 points is recommended to manage normal variance.

How often does this tipster make profit?

The service has recorded profitable months 53.85% of the time across 26 tracked months.

How long can losing periods last?

The longest recorded losing streak is 4 months.

Does this tipster have a real betting edge?

The average expected value per bet is 0.1080, indicating a strong statistical advantage.

How is this tipster score calculated?

This tipster currently has a 58% comparison score and is graded as Watchlist. The score is weighted across consistency (53.9% of months profitable), recent ROI (-19.9% over the last 3 months), drawdown control (40 points), profit efficiency, and track record depth (26 months).

Why can a high-profit tipster rank lower?

Raw profit is important, but this page also weights risk and stability. A tipster can show strong short-term profit (currently -838.75 points over 3 months) yet rank lower if drawdowns are larger, consistency is weaker, or performance history is shorter.

How often are tipster metrics updated?

Tipster metrics are updated monthly after importing all tipster results and recalculating the scoring matrix.

What data source is used for this tipster page?

This page uses tracked historical results and platform analytics for this service, including ROI, strike rate, drawdown, and profitability trends. Current profile classification is Mixed Profile and risk classification is Medium Risk.

How do I compare this tipster with others?

Use Compare Tipsters to review services side by side by ROI, strike rate, drawdown, and risk profile.

What other FAQs are shown on this tipster page?

Each page includes core FAQs on scoring, ranking logic, update cadence, source data, and comparison guidance. Some tipsters may also include additional custom questions where editorial notes are available.